Discuss Health Forums  

Go Back   Discuss Health Forums > Various Medical Branches > Oncology
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Oncology Here we can have open discussion on any issue related to cancer

Discuss Health Forum
Dermatology Forum
Gastroenterology Forum
Obstetrics and Gynecology Forum
Endocrinology/Diabetes Forum
Orthopedics Forum
Nephrology Forum
Infectology Forum
Virology Forum
Urology Forum
Oncology Forum
Cardiology Forum
Neurology Forum
Pediatrics Forum
E.N.T. Forum
Ophthalmology Forum
Dentistry Forum
Psychiatry Forum
Cosmetic Surgery Forum
Respiratory & Sleep Medicine Forum
Dental Surgery Forum
Joint Surgery Forum
General Surgery Forum
Vascular Surgery Forum
Neurosurgery Forum
Cardiothoracic Surgery Forum
Eating Habits, Exercises and many more Forum
Latest Updates Forum
Women Empowerment Forum
Men's Health Forum
Elder Care Discussion Forum
Health Articles
WHO: Over 85M African kids get polio vaccination
Symptoms
Conjunctivitis
Amblyopia
Lupus Nephritis
Angina Pectoris
Heart Attack
Vaginal Yeast Infection
Chlamydia
Haemophilia
Osteoporosis
Obesity
Hypertension (high blood pressure)
Alcohol - more harmful to society than drugs
Exercise
Cold and Flu
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Being Breast Aware
Pain In The Neck?
Junk Food lowers Children’s IQ
Chocolate Healthier Than Fruit
Sniffer Dogs Sniff out Cancer
Ambulances are sized up
Our Partners
Canadian Pharmacy
Drug Information Online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-05-2010, 09:54 AM
Peggy9 Peggy9 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 286
Default Is breast screening in the under 50's a waste of time?

A recent article in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute that was printed in July this year says that it is being acknowledged by the world’s health agencies that they may have got it wrong when it comes to regular mammogram screening for breast cancer.

Commonly women are asked to start screening when they are 40 but it seems that this might be a complete waste of time and resources

Apparently the reason for this is that mammogram x-rays are not nearly sensitive enough to pick up signs of tumour growth in women whoa re screened in their 40s. It was researchers at Stanford University School of Medicine have discovered that attempting to rely on this inadequate technology accounted for almost 80% of all cancers that were missed by the screening process. The reason for this is that in women aged 50 and under breast tissue, is just too dense for a mammogram to identify a tumour. Women over the age of 50, however are good candidates for mammogram screening with a better identification rate, although fast-growing tumours still prove very difficult to identify using this type of screening.

I find this a bit worrying as if this screening is not going to help then what will? On the other hand it is obviously not great to be feeling fine that we have had a clear mammogram result when we actually have cancer!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:58 AM.


Copyright 2000-2010 DiscussHealth.org Inc. All Rights Reserved.